CIP Experts at EHEDG World Congress 2026

CIP Experts at EHEDG World Congress 2026

ValidationBeverage

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Full FlowQeeper integration across 4 CIP circuits. Operators went from paper logs to real-time monitoring with automatic cycle reports in 6 weeks — without replacing a single piece of CIP equipment.

About FlowQeeper

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant
CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

-23% Cycle
time

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

-31% Water
consumption

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

100% documentation
coverage

PROJECT SNAPSHOT

Key Facts at a Glance

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Industry

Dairy processing

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Equipment

4 CIP circuits, 12 process
vessels

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Challenge

No real-time CIP visibility or digital records

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Solution

FlowQeeper monitoring
and reporting

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Timeline

6 weeks from survey to go-live

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Key result

-23% cycle time,
-31% water use

THE SITUATION

What the Plant Was Facing Before the Project

The plant operated four CIP circuits covering milk reception, pasteurization, filling, and return lines. All CIP records were paper-based — operators filled in logbooks by hand after each cycle completed. There was no sensor integration for rinse end-point control, and conductivity readings were taken manually at the end of each phase.

The quality team had no way to review what actually happened during CIP execution in real time. Deviations — if they occurred — were only identified after the cycle had ended, and only if the operator noticed and recorded them. Before audits, compiling complete CIP records required hours of manual document review.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

THE CHALLENGE

The Problem That Needed to Be Solved

The plant faced a combination of operational, quality, and compliance problems that paper-based CIP management could not address.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

No real-time visibility

CIP execution could not be monitored during the cycle. Deviations were only visible after the fact, if logged at all.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Operator-dependent execution

Cycle results varied between shifts and operators. Fixed timers did not adjust to actual cleaning conditions.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Timer-controlled rinse phases

Rinsing ran for a preset duration regardless of actual conductivity or product carryover. Water was consistently over-used.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Incomplete documentation

Paper logbooks had missing entries, illegible data, and gaps that required re-work before every audit or quality review.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

No alert capability

If a parameter deviated — temperature drop, incomplete detergent phase — there was no mechanism to notify anyone until the cycle was finished.

WHY IT MATTERED

Why the Issue Could Not Be Left Unresolved

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Hygiene risk

Without end-point control, rinsing could stop before product carry-over reached an acceptable level — a direct food safety risk.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Unnecessary resource waste

Fixed rinse timers consumed 15–20% more water per cycle than sensor-driven end-point control would require.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Audit exposure

Incomplete paper records left the plant exposed during BRC and IFS audits. Verifying cleaning compliance required significant manual work.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Sustainable Outcomes

We help manufacturers achieve reliable cleaning results with lower water, energy, chemical use, and rework.

PROJECT OBJECTIVE

What the Project Needed to Achieve

01

Replace paper logs with automatic digital
cycle documentation

02

Implement real-time CIP monitoring with
alert capability

03

Introduce sensor-driven rinse
end-point control

04

Complete IQ/OQ/PQ documentation
for all 4 circuits

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

THE SOLUTION

What Was Done and Why This Approach Was Chosen

FlowQeeper was selected because it could be integrated with the existing CIP station hardware without replacing pumps, valves, or piping. The approach focused on adding measurement and intelligence to what was already in place.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

FlowQeeper monitoring
on all 4 circuits

Real-time conductivity, temperature, and flow data captured continuously for each CIP phase

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Sensor integration
into existing lines

Conductivity and temperature probes installed at CIP return positions. No modifications to process equipment.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Automatic
cycle reports

Each completed CIP cycle generates a timestamped report with all critical parameters — no operator input required.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Sensor-driven
rinse end-point

Rinsing stops when conductivity reaches the validated threshold, not when the timer expires. Each circuit configured independently.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

MS Teams
alerts

Deviation alerts sent instantly when parameters move outside defined limits during cycle execution.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

IQ/OQ/PQ
documentation

FlowQeeper data used as the primary evidence base for qualification across all 4 CIP circuits.

IMPLEMENTATION

How the Project
Was Delivered in Practice

Scope review and sensor mapping

On-site survey of all 4 CIP circuits. Sensor positions confirmed, connection points identified, and existing control logic reviewed.

Week 1

Hardware installation and wiring

Conductivity and temperature sensors installed at CIP return positions. FlowQeeper units connected to existing PLC infrastructure.

Week 2

Recipe configuration and baseline data

CIP recipes configured in FlowQeeper for each circuit. Baseline cycle data collected across 5 full cleaning cycles per circuit
to establish normal ranges.

Week 3-4

Operator training and go-live

Shift operators trained on dashboard, cycle review, and alert response. Parallel paper log phase completed. System went live with full monitoring.

Week 5

OQ/PQ validation documentation

FlowQeeper cycle data used to generate OQ and PQ evidence packages for all 4 circuits. Qualification completed on schedule.

Week 5

RESULTS

What Changed After Implementation

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

-23%

Average CIP cycle time across all 4 circuits

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

-31%

Water consumption
per CIP cycle

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

100%

Documentation coverage — all cycles auto-logged

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

zero

Incomplete or missing records since go-live

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

4

Deviations detected and resolved in first 90 days via alerts

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

6 weeks

From first site visit to completed IQ/OQ/PQ qualification

PROJECT EVIDENCE

Screens, Photos, and Validation Evidence from the Project

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Anomaly Detection & Alerts

Configurable threshold alerts for every parameter.
Push notifications to operators the moment a deviation occurs — not at the end of the shift.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Process Monitoring

Live per-line dashboards showing all critical CIP parameters. Each cleaning line has its own view — operators see exactly what is happening, right now.

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Real-Time Monitoring

Live per-line dashboards showing all critical CIP parameters. Each cleaning line has its own view — operators see exactly what is happening, right now.

KEY TAKEAWAY

What This Project Shows in Practice

Real-time CIP monitoring does not require replacing equipment. Adding FlowQeeper to an existing CIP station gave this plant full execution visibility, automatic documentation, and measurable resource savings in 6 weeks. The qualification process was faster because the data was already there — no manual collection needed.

“Before FlowQeeper, our quality team spent hours before each audit pulling paper records together. Now the report is generated automatically after every cycle.”

— Quality Manager, Dairy Processing Plant

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Solutions Behind This Result

Explore Similar Projects

CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Dairy

Optimization

CIP Station Modernization for a Dairy

Legacy CIP station was replaced with a fully automated unit. Control logic redesigned for 3 new product lines, validated to EHEDG standards.

  • ZERO Contamination events in 12 months
  • 100% IQ/OQ/PQ Validation completed
  • -28% Cleaning time reduction
CIP Digitalization at a Dairy Processing Plant

Brewery

Optimization

FlowQeeper

CIP Station Modernization for a Craft Brewery

Legacy CIP station was replaced with a fully automated unit. Control logic redesigned for 3 new product lines, validated to EHEDG standards.

  • -28% Cleaning time reduction
  • ZERO Contamination events in 12 months
  • 100% IQ/OQ/PQ Validation completed

Looking for a Similar Result in Your Plant?

If your team is dealing with manual CIP records, timer-based cleaning, or weak process visibility, a practical conversation is the right next step. We will help you assess scope, timeline, and what is achievable with your existing equipment.

Talk to an Expert Request a Consultation

Looking for CIP Process Challenges?

Tell us about your plant, your challenge, or your project —
we’ll respond within 1 business day with a relevant answer or a proposed scope.

  • Free 30-min consultation — no obligation
  • Response within 1 business day
  • No invoice until scope is agreed

Or book a free 30-min consultation